Materialism and the Mysterium Magnum Prologue "What has come to an end is the distinction between the sensual and the super-sensual, together with the notion, at least as old as Parmenides, that whatever is not given to the senses... is more real, more truthful, more meaningful than what appears; that it is not just beyond sense perception but above the world of the senses... In increasingly strident voices, the few defenders of metaphysics have warned us of the danger of nihilism inherent in this development. The sensual... cannot survive the death of the super-sensual without nihilism setting in." Hannah Arendt Not only is the universe stranger than we suspect; it is stranger than we can suspect. J. B. S. Haldane The causes we know everything about depend on causes we know very little about, which depend on causes we know absolutely nothing about. Tom Stoppard We are like flies crawling across the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel: we cannot see what angels and gods lie underneath the threshold of our perceptions. We do not live in reality; we live in our paradigms, our habituated perceptions, our illusions; the illusions we share through culture we call reality, but the true historical reality of our condition is invisible to us. William Irwin Thompson "The nothingness 'before' the creation of the universe is the most complete void that we can imagine - no space, time, or matter existed... Yet this unthinkable void converts itself into a plenum of existence - a necessary consequences of physical laws. Where are these laws written into that void? What "tells" the void that it is pregnant with a possible universe? It would seem that even the void is subject to a law, a logic that exists prior to space and time." Heinz Pagels Just as we cannot bite our own teeth, the human mind cannot comprehend itself. Alan Watts paraphrase. Something deeply hidden had to be behind things. Einstein The task of the novelist is to deepen mystery, and mystery is a great embarrassment to the modern mind. Flannery O'Connor There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy. Shakespeare "The whole is more than the sum of its parts" Ludwig von Bertalanffy, General System Theory The fact that we are totally unable to imagine a form of existence without space and time by no means proves that such an existence is itself impossible. Carl Jung "The consciousness of the scientist, in his mechanized, dead and dumb universe, logically reaches the point where --- if he practices his science existentially and not merely intellectually -- the meaning of his own existence becomes an absurdity and he stands on the rim of the abyss of nihil face to face with his own nothingness. People are not aware of this dilemma. That it does not cause great concern is in itself a symptom of the sub-marine earthquake of which our most desperate world-problems are merely symptomatic... It is becoming ever clearer that the terrors of war, hunger and despoliation are neither economic, nor technological problems for which there are economic or technological solutions. They are primarily spiritual problems..." Frederick Franck (Frederick Franck was born into a non-observant Jewish family in Holland. He was subsequently baptized a Protestant. After graduating as a dentist, Franck began the first dental clinic at Albert Schweitzer's hospital in West Africa. Later, having embarked a career as writer and artist, Mr. Franck heeded Pope John XXIII's call to build a society of peace on earth (Pacem in Terris.) Franck became the official artist of the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965) and, as a tribute to Pope John, has created a temple of all faiths called Pacem in Terris on his property in Warwick, New York.) "The future of a civilization depends on our overcoming the meaninglessness and hopelessness which characterizes the thought of men today." Albert Schweitzer A person is neither a thing nor a process but an opening through which the Absolute can manifest. Martin Heiddeger Not to dream boldly may turn out to be simply irresponsible. John Leonard In this country we encourage "creativity" among the mediocre, but real bursting creativity appalls us. We put it down as undisciplined, as somehow "too much." Pauline Kael We are not human beings trying to be spiritual. We are spiritual beings trying to be human. Jacquelyn Small The coming peril is the intellectual, educational, psychological and artistic overproduction, which, equally with economic overproduction, threatens the wellbeing of contemporary civilisation. People are inundated, blinded, deafened, and mentally paralysed by a flood of vulgar and tasteless externals, leaving them no time for leisure, thought, or creation from within themselves. G. K. Chesterton Toronto, 1930 The problem is not bad politics, but a bad way of life. Wendell Berry "The problems are our lives. In the 'developed countries', at least, the large problems occur because all of us are living either partly wrong or almost entirely wrong. It was not just the greed of corporate shareholders and the hubris of corporate executives that put the fate of Prince William Sound into one ship (the Exxon Valdez); it was also our demand that energy be cheap and plentiful.... To fail to see this is to go on dividing the world falsely between guilty producers and innocent consumers." "What Are People For," Wendell Berry http://www.alteich.com/links/berry.htm "And so there is the Territory of self-righteousness. It is easy to assume that we do not participate in what we are not in the presence of. But if we are members of a society, we participate, willy-nilly, in its evils. Not to know this is obviously to be in error, but it is also to neglect some of the most necessary and the most interesting work. How do we reduce our dependency on what is wrong? ..... There is also the Territory of historical self-righteousness: if we had lived south of the Ohio in 1830, we would not have owned slaves; if we had lived on the frontier, we would have killed no Indians, violated no treaties, stolen no land. The probability is overwhelming that we belong to a generation that will be found by its successors to have behaved deplorably. Not to know that is, again, to be in error and to neglect essential work, and some of this work, as before, is work of the imagination. How can we imagine our situation or our history if we think we are superior to it?" Wendell Berry When asked what he thought of Western civilization, Mahatma Gandhi replied: "I think it would be a good idea." The fullest life is impossible without an immovable belief in a Living Law in obedience to which the whole universe moves. Gandhi The essential contribution Gandhi made to the 20th century thought was his insistence on the need for a lower standard of living... He maintained that the essence of civilization consists not in the multiplication of wants but in their deliberate and voluntary renunciation. He preached a higher standard of living and maintained that a lower level of material well-being was a necessary pre-requisite. Ronald Duncan At a time when a large part of humankind is beginning to discard Christianity, it is worth while to understand clearly why it was originally accepted. It was accepted in order to escape, at last, from the brutality of antiquity. As soon as we discard it licentiousness returns, as is impressively exemplified by life in modern cities. Carl Gustav Jung 1700 years ago, Romans packed the Coliseum to cheer wild animals eating live human beings. This slaughter was, arguably, the ancient world's most sought-after entertainment. Royalty, nobility, professionals, artisans, laborers and peasants prized "a good seat at the games." It was the mystical dogma of Bentham and Adam Smith and the rest, that some of the worst of human passions would turn out to be all for the best. It was the mysterious doctrine that selfishness would do the work of unselfishness. Self-interest remains the very religion of the corporate world. Paul Wachtel Intentional activity is based on belief. Whether human beings subscribe to animist totems, to squabbling deities atop Mount Olympus, to the transcendental Father God of Judeo-Christianity, the agnosticism of Buddhism, the atheism of Jainism, the Golden Calf of free market capitalism, or Hinduism's lingam and yoni, belief is essentially religious. All core values intend to "re-ligature" ("re-ligare" = "re-ligion") the primordial rent in the human spirit. Open consideration of Belief qua Belief, whether "sacred" or "secular," "religious" or "political," "philosophical" or "theological," obliges us to re-value all cultural phenomena as attempts to ligate this existential breach. Without this re-valuation, the military-industrial-educational complex becomes the "default value system." And so, the Golden Calf grows increasingly autonomous, arrogating to itself "the terms" of every debate. In consequence, debate is rendered meaningless by the force of bureau-institutional fascism predicated on unipolar (mono-polistic) Materialism. Simultaneously, Materialism places itself beyond debate while carefully conditioned citizens prostrate themselves as thoroughly scripted Consumer Units. Inexorably, the compulsive acquisition of "things" results in such deep narcotization that people lose the meta-level ability to formulate meaningful criticism of context. The sensory bias of materialism focuses people on consumable content, negligent of immaterial factors that comprise the contextual framework of their lives. When the unipolar Materialist trap is definitively sprung, everyone of us will serve simultaneously as warden and inmate. William Blake observed that "we become what we perceive." Spellbound by the unacknowledged Deity whose intentions we serve but fail to limn, we deify things and reify people. Worship is inevitable. At stake is the "God" in whose image humankind remakes itself. Alan Archibald Radix malorum est cupiditas. ("The root of evil is cupidity." Cupidity is the self-interested desire for "things," or, for people who are construed as things.) Chaucer America! The land of stuff, more stuff and where the hell am I going to store the stuff? Through and through the world is infected with quantity. To talk "sense" is to talk in quantities. Albert North Whitehead Science can only speak of quantity. The definition of quality depends on the definition of "proper ends." I believe that in actual fact, philosophy ranks before and above the natural sciences. Thomas Mann It is characteristic that Einstein and Planck had the greatest admiration for Kant's work, agreeing with his view that philosophy should be the basis of all sciences. Ilse Rosenthal-Schneider, "Reality and Scientific Truth" Philosophers have to regain their nerve to trust in the use of human reason. It does seem intellectually dishonest, even cowardly, to refuse to make distinctions in the name of tolerance. While accepting that people may disagree, we need not treat every position as equal, every argument as valid. Rev. Richard John Neuhaus, editor "First Things" A legitimate plurality of positions has yielded to an undifferentiated pluralism, based upon the assumption that all positions are equally valid. John Paul II We have turned science into a sacred cow and are suffering the consequences idolatry invariably exacts. Houston Smith People pay for what they do and still more for what they have allowed themselves to become. And they pay for it very simply, by the lives they lead. James Baldwin (Quoted by dying protagonist of Spike Lee's movie "Bamboozled") "To make one's own rules is the highest freedom." Martin Heidigger I often hear that right and wrong are up to the individual. Of course, that is nonsense. Right and wrong are not up to us. If right and wrong were up to us, that would make Hitler right because he thought he was right. And he was not right. Right and wrong exist. They are invisible realities that we discover. We do not invent them. Barbara Ward If what is good, what is right, what is true is only what the individual chooses to invent, then we are outside the tradition of civility. We are back in the war of all against all. Walter Lippmann, 1955 "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with inherent and inalienable rights; that among these, are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness." Declaration of Independence as originally written by Thomas Jefferson, 1776. Jefferson highlights the essential question. Can morality survive if value, truth and right do not subsist in the Ground of Being? It is often argued that personal idealism is sufficient guarantee of human rights. This notion is romantic debris from the 19th century. Human beings - certainly myself - provide few (if any) dependable guarantees. Of course, nothing prevents our assertion that rights can be warranted by human validation. However, in that event, I believe - and believe it is demonstrable - that Mao Tse Tung's argument prevails: "Political power comes from the barrel of a gun." Human law has the true nature of law only insofar as it corresponds to right reason, and therefore is derived from the eternal law. Insofar as it falls short of right reason, a law is said to be a wicked law; and so, lacking the true nature of law, it is rather a kind of violence. Thomas Aquinas The history of the 20th century proves the view that as the vision of God fades, we first become clever monkeys; then we exterminate one another. Paul Johnson Unless the cause of peace-based-on-law gathers behind it the force and zeal of a religion, it hardly can hope to succeed......There must be added that deep power of emotion which is a basic ingredient of religion. Einstein H.G. Wells and George Bernard Shaw placed their trust in their own systems of belief, which were based on human reason. Unable to find lasting inner peace, they slowly lost confidence in what they believed. Wells' final literary work has been aptly called "a scream of despair." And shortly before Shaw died in 1950, he wrote, "The science to which I pinned my faith is bankrupt. Its counsels, which should have established the millennium, have led directly to the suicide of Europe. I believed them once. In their name I helped to destroy the faith of millions. And now they look at me and witness the great tragedy of an atheist who has lost his faith." Near the end of his life, Jean-Paul Sartre told Pierre Victor: "I do not feel that I am the product of chance, a speck of dust in the universe, but someone who was expected, prepared, prefigured. In short, a being whom only a Creator could put here; and this idea of a creating hand refers to God." Fellow philosopher and long-time companion Simone de Beauvoir protested: "How should one explain the senile act of a turncoat?" All the books were beginning to turn against me. Indeed, I must have been blind as a bat not to have seen, long before, the ludicrous contradiction between my theory of life and my actual experiences as a reader. George MacDonald (the Scottish fantasist) had done more to me than any other writer; of course it was a pity he had that bee in his bonnet about Christianity. He was good in spite of it. Chesterton had more sense than all the other moderns put together; bating, of course, his Christianity. Johnson was one of the few authors whom I felt I could trust utterly; curiously enough, he had the same kink. Spenser and Milton by a strange coincidence had it too. Even among ancient authors the same paradox was to be found. The most religious (Plato, Aeschylus, Virgil) were clearly those on whom I could really feed. On the other hand, those writers who did not suffer from religion and with whom in theory my sympathy ought to have been complete -- Shaw and Wells and Mill and Gibbon and Voltaire -- all seemed a little thin, what as boys we called "tinny." It wasn't that I didn't like them. They were all (especially Gibbon) entertaining; but hardly more. There seemed to be no depth in them. They were too simple. The roughness and density of life did not appear in their books..... The only non-Christians who seemed to me really to know anything were the Romantics; and a good many of them were dangerously tinged with something like religion, even at times with Christianity. The upshot of it all could nearly be expressed in a perversion of Roland's great line in the Chanson --- "Christians are wrong, but all the rest are bores." C. S. Lewis Scrooge trembled... "But you were always a good man of business, Jacob," faltered Scrooge. "Business!" cried the Ghost, wringing its hands again. "Mankind was my business. The common welfare was my business; charity, mercy, forbearance, and benevolence, were all my business. The dealings of my trade were but a drop of water in the comprehensive ocean of my business." Charles Dickens The Prince and the two children were standing with their heads hung down, their cheeks flushed, their eyes half closed; the strength all gone from them; the enchantment almost complete. But Puddleglum, desperately gathering all his strength, walked over to the fire. Then he did a very brave thing. He knew it wouldn't hurt him quite as much as it would hurt a human; for his feet (which were bare) were webbed and hard and cold-blooded like a duck's. But he knew it would hurt him badly enough; and so it did. With his bare foot he stamped on the fire, grinding a large part of it into ashes on the flat hearth. And three things happened at once. First, the sweet, heavy smell grew very much less. For though the whole fire had not been put out, a good bit of it had, and what remained smelled very largely of burnt Marsh-wiggle, which is not at all an enchanting smell. This instantly made everyone's brain far clearer. The Prince and the children held up their heads again and opened their eyes. Secondly, the Witch, in a loud, terrible voice, utterly different from the sweet tones she had been using up till now, called out, "What are you doing? Dare to touch my fire again, mud-filth, and I'll turn the blood to fire inside your veins." Thirdly, the pain itself made Puddleglum's head for a moment perfectly clear and he knew exactly what he really thought. There is nothing like a good shock of pain for dissolving certain kinds of magic. "One word, Ma'am" he said coming back from the fire; limping because of the pain. "One word. All you've been saying is quite right, I shouldn't wonder. I'm a chap who always liked to know the worst and then put the best face I can on it. So I won't deny any of what you said. But there's one thing more to be said, even so. Suppose we have only dreamed, or made up, all those things - trees and grass and sun and moon and stars and Aslan himself. Suppose we have. Then all I can say is that, in that case, the made-up things seem a good deal more important than the real ones. Suppose this black pit of a kingdom of yours is the only world. Well, it strikes me as a pretty poor one. And that's a funny thing, when you come to think of it. We're just babies making up a game, if you're right. But four babies playing a game can make a play-world which licks your real world hollow. That's why I'm going to stand by the play-world. I'm on Aslan's side even if there isn't any Aslan to lead it. I'm going to live as like a Narnian as I can even if there isn't any Narnia. C. S. Lewis Mysticism keeps men sane. As long as you have mystery you have health; when you destroy mystery you create morbidity. The ordinary man has always been sane because the ordinary man has always been a mystic. He has permitted the twilight. He has always had one foot in earth and the other in fairyland. He has always left himself free to doubt his gods; but (unlike the agnostic of to-day) free also to believe in them. He has always cared more for truth than for consistency. If he saw two truths that seemed to contradict each other, he would take the two truths and the contradiction along with them. His spiritual sight is stereoscopic, like his physical sight: he sees two different pictures at once and yet sees all the better for that. Thus he has always believed that there was such a thing as fate, but such a thing as free will also. Thus he believed that children were indeed the kingdom of heaven, but nevertheless ought to be obedient to the kingdom of earth. He admired youth because it was young and age because it was not. It is exactly this balance of apparent contradictions that has been the whole buoyancy of the healthy man. The whole secret of mysticism is this: that man can understand everything by the help of what he does not understand... The mystic allows one thing to be mysterious and everything else becomes lucid... A symbol from physical nature will express sufficiently well the real place of mysticism before mankind. The one created thing which we cannot look at is the one thing in the light of which we look at everything. G. K. Chesterton If materialism is everything, everything tends toward compulsion: "We simply must" Materialists "can't do without" and consequently are trapped by their accumulations. Alternatively, metaphysicians divest and are liberated to the extent they "can do without." It is the greatest of all advantages to enjoy no advantage at all. I found it invariably true, the poorer I am the richer I am. Thoreau Our riches will leave us sick; there will be bitterness in our laughter, and our wine will burn our mouth. Only that good profits which we can taste with all doors open, and which serves all men. Ralph Waldo Emerson Without the inner beauty of a free and harmonious life, (fine food) and eau de cologne can become merely forms of barbarism. Without tolerance and broad spiritual understanding, hygiene will only make for clean animals, very clean and very healthy, but also very animal. External riches will merely smother us, if we do not cultivate inner riches. Miguel de Unamuno The best thing to do with the best things in life is to give them up. Dorothy Day Seek first the reign of God and God's justice, and all these things will come to you as a matter of course. Y'eshua the Nazarene 'When a man stops believing in God he doesn't then believe in nothing, he believes anything.' Chesterton paraphrase If there is no God, nothing matters. If there is a God, nothing else matters. Attributed to H. G. Wells "If God does not exist, everything is permissible." Dostoyevsky, "The Brothers Karamozov A thankful heart is not the greatest virtue but the parent of all others. Cicero Grateful people are happy people: ingrates tend toward misery. The greater the object of one's gratitude, the greater one's happiness. It is easier to be grateful to a person -- or a meta-person --- than to a thing. The atheist's hell is waking up feeling grateful and not knowing to whom. Chesterton paraphrase "I once wanted to become an atheist, but I gave up - they have no holidays." Henny Youngman Trains stop at the train station. Buses stop at the bus station. I have a workstation. Steven Wright The only way to enjoy a day of rest is to honor holy days (i.e., holidays). Researching her book, "Nickel and Dimed," Barbara Ehrenreich was astonished to learn that medieval serfs participated in nearly 150 feast day --- holy days when work was minimal or put off 'til tomorrow. It should be pointed out that if we tried to build education on the single pattern of "the scientific idea of man" and carry it out accordingly, we could only do so by distorting or warping this idea: for we should have to ask what is the nature and destiny of man, and we should be pressing the only idea at our disposal, that is the scientific one, for an answer to our question. Then we would try, contrary to its type, to draw from it (i.e., from the scientific idea) a kind of metaphysics. From the logical point of view, we would have a spurious metaphysics disguised as science and yet deprived of any really philosophical insight; and from the practical point of view, we would have a denial or misconception of those very realities and values without which education loses all human sense or becomes the training of an animal for the utility of the state. Jacques Maritain (Emphasis mine.) In the spirit of Hannah Arendt's "Eichmann in Jerusalem," John Conroy (author of "Ordinary People, Unspeakable Acts") interviews victims of torture as well as the torturers themselves. Conroy observes that the latter have a remarkable ability for rationalization, and describes most of them as cordial, likeable people. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0679419187/ref=pd_cp_sr/103-2905432-4740659 Behind all phenomena and discrete entities in the world, we may observe, intimate or experience existentially in various ways something like a general "order of Being." The essence and meaning of this order are veiled in mystery; it is as much an enigma as the Sphinx, it always speaks to us differently and always, I suppose, in ways that we ourselves are open to, in ways, to put it simply, that we can hear. Alongside the general miracle of Being - both as a part of that miracle and as its protagonist, as a special reiteration of it and a rebellious attempt to know, understand, control and transcend it - stands the miracle of the human spirit, of human existence. Into the infinite silence of the omnipresent order of Being, then, there sounds the impassioned voice of the order of human freedom, of life, of spirit. The subtly structured world of meaningful and hopeful human life, opening new vistas of freedom and carrying man to a deeper experience of Being, the countless remarkable intellectual (mystical, religious, scientific) and moral systems, that special way in which the order of Being both re-creates and, at the same time, lends its own meaning to mythology (in earlier times) and artistic creation (today, i.e., in the historical period), in short the way in which man becomes man in the finest sense of the word - all of this constitutes the "order of life," "the order of the spirit," "the order of human work." Together, it all constitutes an objectivized expression of that "second creation of the world," which is human experience. I would say that this "order of life" is a kind of "legitimate son" of "the order of Being," because it grows out of an indestructible faith in the latter's meaning and a fearless confrontation with its mystery. Over and against this passionate order, which is the work of people created "in God's image," there constantly recurs its evil caricature and misshapen protagonist, "the bastard son of Being," the offspring of indifference to the meaning of Being and vindictive fear of its mystery: the chilling work of man as "the image of the devil": the order of homogenization by violence, perfectly organized impotence and centrally directed desolation and boredom, in which man is conceived as a cybernetic unit without free will, without the power to reason for himself, without a unique life of his own, and where that monstrous ideal, order, is a euphemism for the graveyard. (I refer you to Fromm's excellent analysis of fascism.) Thus against "the order of life," sustained by a longing for meaning and experience of the mystery of Being, there stands this "order of death," a monument to non-sense, an executioner of mystery, a materialization of nothingness. Vaclav Havel "Letters to Olga" (from prison) Only by looking outward, by caring for things that, in terms of pure survival, you needn't bother with at all... and by throwing yourself over and over again into the tumult of the world, with the intention of making your voice count - only thus will you really become a person." Vaclav Havel, "Letters to Olga" The destiny of man is not decided by material computation. When great causes are on the move in the world ... we learn that we are spirits, not animals, and that something is going on in space and time, and beyond space and time, which, whether we like it or not, spells duty. Winston Churchill Radio broadcast to America Receiving an honorary degree from the University of Rochester June 16, 1941 "I believe that when death closes our eyes we shall awaken to a light, of which our sunlight is but the shadow." Arthur Schopenhauer "Every one of us is like a man who sees things in a dream and thinks that he knows them perfectly and then wakes up to find that he knows nothing." Plato Whatever you may say something is, it is not ... the map is not the territory ... the word is not the thing. Alfred Korzybski We should look for someone to eat and drink with before looking for something to eat and drink. Epicurus All human rights are endowed by the creator, and if this dogmatic truth is not believed, all human rights will eventually wither. They literally have no ground to be rooted in. In a profound sense, the modern agnostic world is living off the accumulated capital of Christendom, without realizing who provided its dwindling bankroll. G. K. Chesterton Hobbes, Kant, Locke and Mill believed virtues are necessary to the origin of liberalism. Liberalism lives off the inheritance of pre-modern virtue without having the resources to replenish it. "Virtue and the Making of Modern Liberalism" by Peter Berkowitz, Princeton U. Press Even those who have abandoned the theological specifics of the religious view continue to linger in its afterglow by believing that human beings are endowed with certain unique properties (inherent dignity and inalienable rights), that other organisms do not possess, and that (as a consequence) the highest priority a democratic society can set for itself is to respect the sanctity and worth of the individual. Evolutionists try to justify these tenets as emergent values, but what passes unnoticed (as Walker Percy pointed out) is that the moment the sanctity of the individual is turned into a "value" a huge act of devaluation has already occurred. Houston Smith 'In his farewell address to the General Assembly of the United Nations in October 1971, the retiring Administrator of the United Nations Development Programme, Mr. Paul Hoffman, summed up the situation thus: "Far too much of our technological wizardry has been needlessly employed for exploiting the earth's resources, rather than for rationally using and continually replenishing them. And far too much of our technology has been applied without due consideration for its impact on the human spirit, on our cultures and on our ways of life. As a result, while technology has made it possible for hundreds of millions of people to improve their material conditions, our planet is in many ways becoming a more dangerous and less humanly satisfying home-site for the entire race of man." The danger is not lest the soul should doubt whether there is any bread, but lest, by a lie, it should persuade itself that it is not hungry. Simone Weil Jesus answered and said, "It is written, 'Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God'" We now live in an intellectual milieu of philosophical mono-poly, and will soon discover whether the attempt to live by "bread alone" serves humankind well. I observe that the fascist presumptions built into the presumed superiority of one's "material standard of living" do not bode well. All philosophies predicated on "bread alone" tend toward the philosophical conclusion that "s/he who dies with the most toys wins." Satan is wiser than of yore, And tempts by making rich, (instead of) making poor. Alexander Pope I had come to the conclusion that there was nothing sacred about myself or about any human being, that we were all machines, doomed to collide and collide and collide. For want of anything better to do, we became fans of collisions . .Kurt Vonnegut Only 68 of 200 Anglican priests polled could name all Ten Commandments, but half said they believed in space aliens. I think you should know I worry a lot. Like the Nobel sperm bank. Something bothers me about the world's greatest geniuses sitting around reading pornography and jerking off. Jane Wagner During the decade now beginning, we must learn a new language, a language that speaks not of development and underdevelopment but of true and false ideas about man, and his needs and his potential. Ivan Illich There are a number of small movements abroad All these movements share this in common, that they preach revolt against hustling for hustling's sake. One of the first conditions for attaining a just distribution of resources is that people must abandon their hysterical hustle and their hysterical greediness. Sigrid Undset, Nobel Laureate, 1882 1949 Our modern mode of life has been transformed. This transformation is due chiefly to the increase in the rapidity of communication. Each individual does a great many more things than formerly. Quiet and unemployed moments are exceptional in his existence. The narrow groups of the family and the parish have been dissolved. Intimacy no longer exists. Solitude is looked upon as a punishment or as a luxury. Alexis Carrel Nobel Prize for Medicine, 1912 The lives of our ancestors, when we look back to them, appear to have been infinitely less troubled and momentous than our own - it is rather as if fate had designed us for the denouement of the drama in which we are acting." Andre Breton There is no more fatal blunderer than he who consumes the greater part of his life getting his living. Thoreau, "Life Without Principle" The poor learn to fend in dignity, where no education could teach the rich to survive. Ivan Illich I wasn't yet aware that most of the world's population would rather go hungry than deny food to a stranger. Brian M. Schwartz, "A World of Villages" Men should not consider his material possessions as his own, but as common to all, so as to share them without hesitation, when others are in need. Thomas Aquinas Aquinas does lift Faith above Reason; but does not lowerreason. He does put the supernatural higher than the natural; but does not lower the natural. He says that the lower thing is in every sense worthy' except that compared with the higher it is worthless. This led to a habit of thinking on two levels, or even on three. G. K. Chesterton The modern experiment to live without religion has failed, and once we have understood this, we know what our "post-modern" tasks really are. E. F. Schumacher Tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of all classes, our ancestors. It is the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to that arrogant oligarchy who merely happen to be walking around. G. K. Chesterton We live in a universe where there is more and more information, and less and less meaning. Jean Baudrillard Everybody gets so much information all day long that they lose their common sense. Gertrude Stein Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information? T. S. Eliot .... Information has become a form of garbage, and ourselves garbage collectors.... Like the sorcerer's apprentice, we are awash with information without even a broom to help us get rid of it. Information comes indiscriminately, directed at no one in particular.... And there is no loom to weave it all into fabric. No transcendent narratives to provide us with moral guidance, social purpose, intellectual economy. No stories to tell us what we need to know and what we do not need to know. Neil Postman We Americans are an unprincipled nation, when you come down to it. Not that we're bad or anything. It's just that it's hard for us to pay attention to abstract matters when we have so many concrete matters -- cellular phones, ski boats, salad shooters, trail bikes, StairMasters, snow boards, pasta-making machines, four-door sport utility vehicles, palmcorders, rollerblade skates and CD players for our cars -- to occupy us. No wonder all the great intellectual concepts ... come from pastoral societies... P. J. O'Rourke Our society is dedicated almost entirely to the celebration of the ego, with all its sad fantasies about success and power, and it celebrates those very forces of greed and ignorance that are destroying the planet. Sogyal Rinpoche Everything is so relativized. I think we've got ourselves into a terrible jam there, with all kinds of ideologies that have taught us not to be judgmental. Not being judgmental also, in a way, means not thinking. Salman Rushdie, Mother Jones, July-August, 1999 The grudge against God is the keystone to all one's unhappiness. Follow all your petty, middling, and major grudges back to this keystone grudge, and then ask yourself the question, "Is it more likely that God was wrong to make the world this way, or that I am somehow wrong in the way I'm looking at it?" If you decide that God is wrong --- or that there is no God, just a faceless, mechanical universe that cares nothing about the human drama --- then there isn't much you can do. But if you realize that you can always adjust your perceptions of the world, you can start learning and contributing again. This seems to be the way to both humility and power. Patrick Miller, A Primer on Forgiveness, "The Sun", 9/94 Dear Kim, A couple of weeks ago, I mentioned Huston Smith's view of the universe as seen from the vantage of a dropped ice cream cone. Here's Smith's verbatim explanation of the toppled cone, with a little context. Most moderns assume that "the disposition" of the universe is neutral, or, perhaps, hostile. It is probably fair to say that most moderns who honor "survival-of-the-fittest" as the ultimate framework for viewing and interpreting life, believe that the universe is brutally neutral. In "Why Religion Matters: The Fate of the Human Spirit in an Age of Disbelief," Huston Smith (America's most renowned professor of comparative religion) suggests a radically different view. "If a two year old drops her ice-cream cone, that tragedy is the end of the world for her. Her mother knows that this is not the case. Can there be an understanding of life so staggering in its immensity that, in comparison to it, even gulags and the Holocaust seem like dropped ice-cream cones?" The second and third paragraphs of "Why Religion Matters" read: "I think I have a different window onto the world, one that enables me to see things that others do not. I was born into a loving family whose parents committed their lives to the highest calling they could conceive - that of being missionaries to China. Sacrifices were to be expected, and (in the disease-ridden China of that time) they arrived on schedule: their first born died in their arms on his second Christmas Eve. My parents did good things. In the town they chose for their lifework there was no education for girls, so their first act was to start a girls' school. Now coeducational, it has become the most important primary school in the town. The most important thing I inherited from my parents was faith. Its substance made me, on average, a trusting person, and its content can be stated equally simply: we are in good hands, and in gratitude for that fact we do well to bear one another's burdens. On coming to America, for college, I brought that faith with me, and the rest of my life has been a struggle to keep it intact in the face of modern winds of doctrine that assail it. If those winds were powered by truth, I would bow to them, but as I have not found them to be so, I must point that out. 19th century zoologist Ernst Haeckel said that if he could have one question answered authoritatively it would be, "Is the universe friendly?" The most idealistic is the realistically most practical. Buckminster Fuller PS I mentioned J. B. Priestley in connection with Smith's "ice cream calamity," and - to my surprise - was able to google the pertinent quotation by entering the key words "Priestley, lambency" "Just before I went to America, during the exhausting weeks when I was busy with my Time Plays, I had such a dream, and I think it left a greater impression on my mind than any experience I had ever known before, awake or in dreams, and said more to me about this life than any book I have ever read. The setting of the dream was quite simple, and owed something to the fact that not long before my wife had visited the lighthouse here at St. Catherine's to do some bird ringing. I dreamt I was standing at the top of a very high tower, alone, looking down upon myriads of birds all flying in one direction; every kind of bird was there, all the birds in the world. It was a noble sight, this vast aerial river of birds. But now in some mysterious fashion the gear was changed, and time speeded up, so that I saw generations of birds, watched them break their shells, flutter into life, mate, weaken, falter and die. Wings grew only to crumble; bodies were sleek, and then, in a flash bled and shrivelled; and death struck everywhere at every second. What was the use of all this blind struggle towards life, this eager trying of wings, this hurried mating, this flight and surge, all this gigantic meaningless effort? As I stared down, seeming to see every creature's ignoble little history almost at a glance, I felt sick at heart. It would be better if not one of them, if not one of us, had been born, if the struggle ceased for ever. I stood on my tower, still alone, desperately unhappy. But now the gear was changed again, and the time went faster still, and it was rushing by at such a rate, that the birds could not show any movement, but were like an enormous plain sown with feathers. But along this plain, flickering through the bodies themselves, there now passed a sort of white flame, trembling, dancing, then hurrying on; and as soon as I saw it I knew that this white flame was life itself, the very quintessence of being; and then it came to me, in a rocket burst of ecstasy, that nothing mattered, nothing could ever matter, because nothing else was real but this quivering and hurrying lambency of being. Birds, men and creatures not yet shaped and coloured, all were of no account except so far as this flame of life travelled though them. It left nothing to mourn over behind it; what I had thought was tragedy was mere emptiness or a shadow show; for now all real feeling was caught and purified and danced on ecstatically with the white flame of life. I had never before felt such deep happiness as I knew at the end of my dream of the tower and the birds." Rain Upon Godshill Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction. Blaise Pascal Suffer the little children come unto me, for theirs is the Kingdom of God. I have always been regretting that I was not as wise as the day I was born. Thoreau "Where I Lived and What I Lived For," Walden Adults are obsolete children. Dr. Seuss There are others whose state of mind is still more extraordinary. They not only do not need the landscape to corroborate their history, but they do not care if the landscape contradicts their history... If the map marks the place as a waterless desert, they will declare it as dry as a bone, though the whole valley resound with the rushing river. A whole huge rock will be invisible if a little book on geology says it is impossible. This is at the opposite extreme to the irrational credulity of the rustic, but it is infinitely more irrational... This great delusion of the prior claim of printed matter, as something anterior to experience and capable of contradicting it, is the main weakness of modern urban society. The chief mark of the modern man has been that he has gone through a landscape with his eyes glued to a guidebook, and could actually deny in the one, anything that he could not find in the other. One man, however, happened to look up from the book and see things for himself; he was a man of too impatient a temper, and later he showed too hasty a disposition to tear the book up or toss the book away. But there had been granted to him a strange and high and heroic sort of faith. He could believe his eyes. G. K. Chesterton, "William Cobbett" At the beginning of the road they put up a sign that said MACONDO and another larger one on the main street that said GOD EXISTS. Gabriel Garcia Marquez Do not chase after all kinds of knowledge, enlightenment, and understanding in the hope of gaining the hearts of others. You will gain those hearts more surely by showing openness and graciousness to them. St. John Chrysostom It is a greater miracle to feed the poor than to raise the dead. St. John Chrysostom What is the law of nature? Is it to know that my security and that of my family, all my amusements and pleasures, are purchased at the expense of misery, deprivation, and suffering to thousands of human beings by the terror of the gallows; by the misfortune of thousands stifling within prison walls; by the fears inspired by millions of soldiers and guardians of civilization, torn from their homes and besotted by discipline, to protect our pleasures with loaded revolvers against the possible interference of the famishing! Do I purchase every fragment of bread that I put in my mouth and the mouths of my children by the numberless privations that are necessary to procure my abundance? How can I be certain that my piece of bread belongs only to me when I know that no one should starve while I eat? Leo Tolstoy The supremacy of the law of self-interest is the conclusion of Herbert Spencer's materialistic philosophy; and of the wretched pessimism of Hartmann and Schopenhauer. It is the principle upon which Cain slew his brother. It was the seductive whisper of the serpent in Eve's ear. It is the principle upon which crime is committed. It is the principle upon which the capitalist acts who treats labor as no more than a commodity subject to the lowest market rate and the law of supply and demand. It is the principle upon which railroads are bonded and bankrupted for private ends. It is the law by which money (is loaned to farmers at) usurious and impoverishing rate of interest It is the principle upon which a Chicago financier proceeds, with no more moral justification than the highwayman's robbery of an express train, to "corner" the pork market, and thus force from the mouths of toiling families a million and a half of dollars into his private treasury - a deed for which the giving of some thousands to found city missions and orphans' homes will be no atonement in the reckoning of the God who judges the world in righteousness and not by the ethics of the stock exchange. The law of self-interest is the eternal falsehood which mothers all social and private woes; for sin is pure individualism - the assertion of self against God and humanity. George D. Herron, "The Message of Jesus to Men of Wealth," 22 September 1890 Occasion: An address delivered before the Minnesota Congregational Club, at its annual meeting held in Plymouth Church, Minneapolis, September 22, 1890 Pascal said that within every person there is a "God-shaped vacuum." Nature abhors a vacuum. I believe in the sun even when it is not shining I believe in love even when I am alone I believe in God even when He is silent. (Written on a basement wall where a Jewish refugee had been hiding from agents of the Holocaust.) Albert Camus said future historians would summarize modern man: "He fornicated and read newspapers." Sex without religion is like an egg without salt. Luis Buñuel Our highly vaunted sexual freedom has turned out to be a new puritanism. I define puritanism as a state of alienation from the body, separation of emotion from reason, and use of the body as a machine. Rollo May The supreme reality of our time is our indivisibility as children of God and the common vulnerability of this planet. John Fitzgerald Kennedy Pascal was right in noting that 'humans sink lower than beasts when we aspire to become like angels.' It is also true, however, that humankind must aspire to some spiritual destiny if we would avoid zoological calamity. The notion that humans are children of God - whether or not God exists - is a mantle that wears well. At minimum, it offers more protection to humankind as members of the animal kingdom than "liberating" clever humans as mere animals. Alan Archibald There are people for whom killing a whale is not very different from killing a human being. In fact, for some people killing a whale is worse than killing a human. Animal rights spokesperson quoted in an NPR spot reviewing a recently approved Native American whale hunt. June, 1999 Whether you believe you can or can't, you're right. Henry Ford. The genius of Christianity is to have proclaimed that the path to the deepest mystery is the path of love. Andre Malraux Love... is the extremely difficult realization that something other than oneself is real. Iris Murdoch To most, even good people, god is a belief. To the saints, God is an embrace. Francis Thompson, The Hound of Heaven We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be. Kurt Vonnegut (In 1855) la Ley Lerdo obliged the Church to sell its lands with sales tax going to the state. Speculators snapped up lands. The educational and charitable functions which the Church carried on among Indios ceased. For all its encouragement of superstition and reverence for the existing order, the religious corporations never, as the liberals came to admit, matched the rapacity and cruelty of the new private owners. The Ley Lerdo, in the name of progress, caused a further barbarization of the countryside. "Fire and Blood" (an excellent one volume history of Mexico by T. R. Fehrenbach) The merely rich are not rich enough to rule the modern market. The things that change modern history, the big national and international loans, the big educational and philanthropic foundations, the purchase of numberless newspapers, the big prices paid for peerages, the big expenses often incurred in elections - these are getting too big for everybody except the misers; the men with the largest of earthly fortunes and the smallest of earthly aims. There are two other odd and rather important things to be said about them. The first is this: that with this aristocracy we do not have the chance of a lucky variety in types which belongs to larger and looser aristocracies. The moderately rich include all kinds of people even good people. Even priests are sometimes saints; and even soldiers are sometimes heroes. Some doctors have really grown wealthy by curing their patients and not by flattering them; some brewers have been known to sell beer. But among the Very Rich you will never find a really generous man, even by accident. They may give their money away, but they will never give themselves away; they are egoistic, secretive, dry as old bones. To be smart enough to get all that money you must be dull enough to want it. G.K. Chesterton Alan, I've known a lot of millionaires in my time. But I never knew one who wasn't a sonofabitch. Jackie Imburgia c. 1975 It is not strange...that such an exuberance of enterprise should cause some individuals to mistake change for progress. Millard Fillmore I want first to consider society, the society we may expect to have after this war. We may expect a society that is highly centralized. It may be organized for peace: we hope it will. It may have to be organized against future wars, and if so, so much the worse. But in either case it will be very tightly knit; it will be planned; and it will be bureaucratic. Bureaucracy, in a technical age like ours, is inevitable. The advance of science means the growth of bureaucracy and the reign of the expert. And as a result, society and the state will be the same thing. This has never happened in the past. Society used to be much more diffuse. The government was there, making laws and wars, but it could not interfere so much with the individual: it had not the means. When I was a boy there was no wireless, no motor-cars: at an earlier date there were no telegrams, no railways: earlier still, no posts. You cannot interfere with people unless you can communicate with them easily. Society was diffuse, and in the midst of the diffusion the artist flourished. If he was a painter he painted for the king and the courtiers, who probably had some individual ideas about painting, or for the great aristocrats, or for the local squire, or for the church, which was not an individual but which knew what it wanted as regards subject matter. He lived in a society which was broken up into groups and he had the chance of picking the group which suited him. That society, after lasting for thousands of years, has suddenly hardened and become centralized, and in the future the only effective patron will be the state. "Does Culture Matter?" E. M. Forster, 1940 "This is the huge modern heresy of altering the human soul to fit its conditions, instead of altering human conditions to fit the human soul. If soap boiling is really inconsistent with brotherhood, so much the worst for soap-boiling, not for brotherhood. If civilization really cannot get on with democracy, so much the worse for civilization, not for democracy. Certainly, it would be far better to go back to village communes, if they really are communes. Certainly, it would be better to do without soap rather than to do without society. Certainly, we would sacrifice all our wires, wheels, systems, specialties, physical science and frenzied finance for one half-hour of happiness such as has often come to us with comrades in a common tavern. I do not say the sacrifice will be necessary; I only say it will be easy." Chesterton, "The Insane Necessity" We of today can hardly imagine how seamlessly traditional peoples have woven the great world of nature into the spiritual aspects of their lives. To cite a single example, the Pawnee people of Oklahoma patter their houses after the architecture of nature as they understand it. Still today, often sitting at night on rooftops, children hear from their parents how Evening Star and the Moon created the first girl child, and Morning Star and the Sun created the first boy child. The Great Chief star that shines from the direction of the winter wind and never moves is pointed out to them, and until sleep overcomes them, they watch the rest of the stars circle around him. The Great Chief star reminds tribal chiefs of their responsibility to care for their people. Nothing like this sense of belonging can be derived from the scientific worldview. In his 9th decade now, Czeslaw Milosz sees himself as having lived to see the dawning of "the age of homelessness." Houston Smith No human being escapes the necessity of conceiving some good outside himself toward which his thought turns in a movement of desire, supplication, and hope... Consequently, the only choice is between worshipping the true God or an idol. Every atheist is an idolater --- unless he is worshipping the true God in his impersonal aspect. The majority of the pious are idolaters." Simone Weil Idolatry is in our very nature, she (i.e., Weil) is declaring, and when disguised (as scientific pursuit, as politics, as a deep affection for nature, as a religious ritual and practice) is no less what it is, though perhaps more dangerous, potentially, because not even acknowledged. If only some of us who have been psychoanalyzed, and who look deeply into the psychological life of others, were able to be so forcefully analytic about ourselves! I remember an aphorism I used to hear from William Carlos Williams as he went from home to home, making his rounds (of the NJ working class poor), still recovering he'd say from some disappointment or serious impasse in his 'other life,' that of the writer. "It's gold or glory or God --- what people worship.' Once when I added the worship intellectuals accord their own ideas and theories, he replied curtly, annoyed with my lack of imagination, "I think that comes under glory, or maybe God!'" "Simone Weil: A Modern Pilgrimage" by Robert Coles M.D. We are convinced that theories do not matter... Never has there been so little discussion about the nature of men as now, when, for the first time, anyone can discuss it... Good taste, the last and vilest of human superstitions, has succeeded in silencing us where all the rest have failed. Sixty years ago it was bad taste to be an avowed atheist... now it is equally bad taste to be an avowed Christian. But there are some people nevertheless - and I am one of them - who think that the most important thing about man is still his view of the universe... We think the question is not whether the theory of the cosmos affects matters, but whether, in the long run, anything else affects them. G. K. Chesterton Nothing more strangely indicates an enormous and silent evil of modern society than the extraordinary use which is made nowadays of the word "orthodox." In former days the heretic was proud of not being a heretic. It was kingdoms of the world and the police and the judges who were heretics. He was orthodox... All the tortures torn out of forgotten hells could not make him admit that he was heretical... The word "heresy" not only means no longer "being wrong"; it practically means being clear-headed and courageous. The word "orthodoxy" not only no longer means being right, it practically means being wrong... (This) means that people care less for whether they are philosophically right... The dynamiter, laying a bomb, ought to insist that, whatever else he is, at least he is orthodox... General theories are everywhere contemned... We will have no generalizations... We are more and more to discuss art, politics, literature. A man's opinon on tramcars matters; his opinion on Botticelli matters; his opinon on all things does not matter. He may turn over and explore a million objects, but he must not find that strange object, the universe, for if he does, he will have a religion and be lost. Everything matters, except everything. G. K. Chesterton The term clinical depression finds its way into too many conversation these days. One has a sense that a catastrophe has occurred in the psychic landscape. Leonard Cohen I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just. Thomas Jefferson Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. John Adams "(Democracy) was dependent on the existence of virtue among the people. It was such virtue that they expected to resolve the tension between private interest and public good." "Habits of the Heart," Robert Bellah, University of California, Berkeley We have staked the whole future of American civilization, not upon the power of government, far from it. We have staked the future of all of our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind of self-government; upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God. James Madison ...Religion...(is) the basis and foundation of government...before any man can be considered as a member of civil society, he must be considered as a subject of the Governor of the Universe. James Madison The psychic task which a person can and must set for himself is not to feel secure, but to be able to tolerate insecurity. Erich Fromm People wish to be settled. Only as far as they are unsettled is there any hope for them. Emerson To be happy at home is the end of all human activity. Samuel Johnson In this modern world we are confronted with the extraordinary spectacle of people turning to new ideas because they have not tried the old. Men have not got tired of Christianity; they have never found enough Christianity to get tired of. Chesterton The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and left untried. Chesterton, 1910 Sins become more subtle as you grow older: you commit sins of despair rather than sins of lust. Piers Paul Reid According to Aquinas, sin partakes of three characteristics. I remember two: loss of splendor and loss of perspective. Our irrational contemporary Western impatience and our blind adulation of speed for speed's sake are wreaking havoc on the education of our children. We force them as if they were chicks in a pullet factory. We drive them into premature awareness of sex even before physical puberty has overtaken them. In fact we deprive our children of the human right of having a childhood. Arnold Toynbee There are more things to life than increasing its speed. Mahatma Gandhi To be thoroughly modern is to confine oneself to an ultimate narrowness.G. K. Chesterton The modern world is a culture of death. Pope John Paul II Yesterday, nine weeks into the NATO bombing of Kosovo/Serbia, an ongoing NPR report on the life of a young Kosovar, had this to say: "The war has gotten to the point where there's nothing to do but stay inside all day and watch television." In a consumer society, there are inevitably two kinds of slaves: the prisoners of addiction and the prisoners of envy. Ivan Illich St. Romuald's Brief Rule for Camaldolese Monks (excerpt) Sit in your cell as in paradise. Put the whole world behind you and forget it. Watch your thoughts like a good fisherman watching for fish. Realize above all that you are in God's presence, and stand there with the attitude of one who stands before the emperor. Empty yourself completely and sit waiting, content with the grace of God, like the chick who tastes nothing and eats nothing but what his mother brings him. We know to the extent we love. St. Augustine When the evening of this life comes, we shall be judged on love. St. John of the Cross I could talk until about the cows come home about the minority status of Catholics in the North of Ireland. But that ground has been gone over a lot. I would say that the more important Catholic thing is the actual sense of eternal values and infamous vices which our education or formation gives us. There's a sense of profoundness, a sense that the universe can be ashimmer with something , and Catholicism - even if I don't like sentimentalizing it - was the backdrop to that whole thing. The world I grew up in offered me a sense that I was a citizen of the empyrean - the crystalline elsewhere of the world. Seamus Heaney Discovering the Church is apt to be a slow procedure, but it can take place if you have a free mind and no vested interest in disbelief... Flannery O'Connor A story is told of Coleridge who had listened to a vehement argument by a visitor against religious instruction of the young. His caller concluded by stating his determination not to prejudice his children in any form of religion, but to allow them at maturity to choose for themselves. Coleridge made no immediate comment, but shortly afterwards asked his visitor if he would like to see his garden. Saying that he would, Coleridge led his guest to a strip of lawn overgrown with weeds. "Why this is no garden. It is nothing but a weed-patch." "Oh," replied Coleridge, "that is because it has not come to its age of discretion. The weeds you see have taken the opportunity to grow and I thought it unfair of me to prejudice the soil toward roses and strawberries." The work of heaven alone is material; the making of a material world. The work of hell is entirely spiritual. G. K. Chesterton When I was an atheist I had to try to persuade myself that most of the human race have always been wrong about the question that mattered most. When I became a Christian, I was able to take a more liberal view. C. S. Lewis Whilst in this state of philosophic pessimism and general depression of spirits about my prospects, I went one evening into a dressing-room in the twilight to procure soome article that was there; when suddenly there fell upon me without any warning, just as if it came out of the darkness, a horrible fear of my own existence. Simultaneously, there arose in my mind the image of an epileptic patient whom I had seen in the asylum, a black-haired youth with greenish skin, entirely idiotic, who used to sit all day on one of the benches, or rather shelves against the wall, with his knees drawn up against his chin, and the coarse gray undershirt, which was his only garment, drawn over them inclosing his entire figure. He sat there like a sort of sculptured Egyptian cat or Peruvian mummy, moving nothing but his black eyes and looking absolutely non-human. This image and my fear entered into a species of combination with each other. That shape I am, I felt, potentially. Nothing that I possess can defend me against that fate, if the hour for it should strike for me as it struck for him. There was such a horror of him, and such a perception of my own merely momentary discrepancy from him, that it was as if something hitherto solid within my breast gave way entirely, and I became a mass of quivering fear. After this the universe was changed for me altogether. I awoke morning after morning with a horrible dread at the pit of my stomach, and with a sense of the insecurity of life that I never knew before, and that I have never felt since. It was like a revelation; and although the immediate feelings passed away, the experience has made me sympathetic with the morbid feelings of others ever since. It gradually faded, but for months I was unable to go out into the dark alone. In general I dreaded to be left alone. I remember wondering how other people could live, how I myself had ever lived, so unconscious of that pit of insecurity beneath the surface of life. My mother in particular, a very cheerful person, seemed to me a perfect paradox in her unconsciousness of danger, which you may well believe I was very careful not to disturb by revelations of my own state of mind. I have always thought that this experience of melancholia of mine had a religious bearing... I mean that the fear was so invasive and powerful that if I had not clung to scripture texts like "The eternal God is my refuge," etc., "Come unto me, all ye that labor and are heavy-laden," etc., "I am the resurrection and the life," etc., I think I should have grown really insane. William James, author "The Varieties of Religious Experience" And the wind shall say: 'Here were decent godless people: Their only monument the asphalt road And a thousand lost golf balls'. T. S. Eliot *** Mysterium Magnum Text Dear Rob, Thanks for your email. Your reading list is interesting. What's "Enemy Women" about? I would recommend you replace Armstrong's "A History of God" with Huston Smith's "Why Religion Matters: The Fate of the Human Spirit in an Age of Disbelief." (© 2001) I was grabbed by the first paragraph of the Preface which contains this memoir: "I was born into a loving family whose parents committed their lives to the highest calling they could conceive that of being missionaries to China. Sacrifices were to be expected, and (in the disease-ridden China of that time) their firstborn died in their arms on his second Christmas Eve." I'm tempted to second your choice of Smith's "World Religions" --- a very useful survey, twice updated since publication in the '60s. However, "World Religions" is uneven in places, and - given the limitations of time - I would recommend instead "Why Religion Matters." Even here, there is uneven-ness. However, Smith does such a splendid job focusing the essential "modern question" that I must recommend it. To repeat part of yesterday's email, the essential "modern question" is epitomized by Hannah Arendt's description of modernity's stark limitations: "What has come to an end is the distinction between the sensual and the super-sensual, together with the notion, at least as old as Parmenides, that whatever is not given to the senses... is more real, more truthful, more meaningful than what appears; that it is not just beyond sense perception but above the world of the senses... In increasingly strident voices, the few defenders of metaphysics have warned us of the danger of nihilism inherent in this development. The sensual... cannot survive the death of the super-sensual without nihilism setting in." Hannah Arendt (I can never mention "modernity's limitations" without recalling Chesterton's observation that "To be merely modern is to confine oneself to an ultimate narrowness." Interestingly, C.S. Lewis - in his splendid novel, "The Great Divorce" argues that Hell is a form of claustrophobia. In similar vein, Buddhists represent nirvana as panoramic spaciousness.) Smith notes that all traditional religions hold the following beliefs in common: 1.) the primacy of spirit and the derivativeness of matter, 2.) that humans are "lesser beings" derived from "greater Being," 3.) that meaning (and not value-free information) is primary, 4.) that humans should consider themselves "at home" in the universe, and 5.) there will be a "happy ending." (These last two points recall the great 19th century zoologist Ernst Haeckel's over-riding desire for a definitive answer to the question: "Is the universe friendly?") These underpinnings of traditional religion suppose that humans are enveloped by "something" larger than themselves and that they would wisely harmonize themselves with the nature of this "something." According to the traditional view, we are, paradoxically, free to be ourselves only when we recognize the supremacy of "that which is greater than ourselves." Humbled by this recognition, we will behave with reverence in "its" presence which is everywhere and, presumably, beyond. (As I write this, I suddenly recall "he who will not be named." Interestingly, orthodox Jews have always refused to speak God's name out loud and even omit the vowels when spelling it: YHWH. Chesterton observed that 'The sacred is secret." It is true that Genesis lays on humankind the noble task of "naming all the creatures." However, reverence for "the uncreated," -- "that which is greater than ourselves," "that which cannot be named" -- requires deference to the unspeakable; stillness before the un-nameable.) The (post)modern worldview -- and the pseudo-philosophical accretions that have gathered around its scientific underpinnings - posit an opposite (or nearly opposite) premise for every traditional fundament. Ultimately, the post-modern view distills to the belief that human beings are adrift in an intrinsically meaningless, completely indifferent universe. Notably and almost paradoxically - this cosmic marginalization of "man" results in the psychological inflation of "Superman." Ignored by a callous universe, we must do everything on our own. The upshot is that post-moderns arrogate to themselves omnipotence at the very moment they exile themselves from the universe-as-a-happy-home. By our own "choice" we have become aliens in our own land. Ernest Gellner says the only 'true' knowledge in the modern world is the kind that digs into nature's foundations and increases our ability to control it. "Reductionism (is) the view that everything in the world is really something else (i.e., reduces to something else), and that "something else" is coldly impersonal It was Kant's merit to see the inescapable price of this Faustian purchase of real (sic) knowledge. (In delivering) cognitive effectiveness (it) exacts its inherent moral, "dehumanizing" price The price of real (sic) knowledge is that our identities, freedoms (and) norms, are no longer underwritten by our vision and comprehension of things. On the contrary we are doomed to suffer from a tension between cognition and identity." In other words, we see ourselves as good, kind people, but see the underpinnings of the universe as cold, callous and indifferent with an inclination toward final destruction. Where, pray tell, is "the ground" in which goodness and kindness take root? "In an ever-changing incomprehensible world, the masses had reached the point where they would... think that everything was possible and that nothing was true... Hannah Arendt I fear that the epistemology of science has exceeded its proper bounds, and, in the process of expansion, has created a totalitarian regime whose motto is: "Everything is possible. Nothing is true." When Einstein says "Imagination is more important than knowledge" he flatly declares that humankind's collective imagination concerning its nature, origin and destiny (as detailed in Smith's 5 points above) is more important than any knowledge that deflates this collective vision. In "Science, Philosophy and Religion: a Symposium," Einstein says "Science without religion is lame." Modernity (and post-modernity) oblige us to live in a kind of self-contained "bubble." Within this bubble, science has learned to focus an extremely bright, keenly-analytical light on the "inside wall," confident that there is no "outside," and certain that there is no self-subsistent "wellspring of meaning" that infuses humankind with unconditional hope and the bedrock belief that our material/immaterial universe - as an unfathomable whole ultimately validates joy no matter how painful any particular set of circumstances. The need for an "inside" and an "outside" - the need for "the sensual" and the "super-sensual" - is the only way humans can avoid the devastation that accompanies the "elimination" of natural polarities. This is to say that by refusing to recognize pre-ordained cosmic polarities -- "inside/outside"; "sensual/super-sensual" polarities that enlarge the human spirit across a cosmic spectrum, the resulting "polarity void" and the birth of totalitarian "uni-polarity" shrink the human condition until we are stifled by psycho-spiritual claustrophobia and the hellish despair that follows. Pain and the denial of death pervade this discussion, so I will mention at the outset Ivan Illich's stunning observation concerning the proper role of pain and how we have deformed it. "The medical campaign to eliminate pain overlooks the connection between pain and happiness. As we decrease our sensitivity to pain we also decrease our ability to experience the simple joys and pleasures of life. The result is that stronger and stronger stimuli - drugs, violence, horror - are needed to provide people in an anesthetic society with a sense of being alive. Increasingly, pain-killing promises an artificially painless life and turns people into unfeeling spectators of their own decaying selves. The very idea of having pain killed by somebody else, rather than facing it, was alien to traditional cultures because pain was a part of man's participation in a marred universe. Its meaning was cosmic and mythic, not individual and technical. Pain was the experience of the soul's evolution, and the soul was present all over the body. The doctor could not eliminate the need to suffer without doing away the patient." (As an aside, I note Dostoyevsky's observation: "Suffering is the source of all consciousness.") As Illich suggests, we do not escape bedrock dualities without serious consequence. It is even harder to escape "unintended consequences" and the essential role of paradox in human affairs. Lao Tzu observes: "The profoundest truths are paradoxical." Einstein said: "There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle." Elsewhere Einstein notes that "Something deeply hidden had to be behind things." We either believe that life is a miracle, or, that it isn't. We either believe that something is "behind it," or not. Once we've chosen and we must choose our entire lives re-constellate. In a recent address to the United Nations, Vaclav Havel said: "Consciousness is prior to being." As absurd as Havel's assertion sounds to most scientists, it highlights the crux of our conundrum and cuts to an essential distinction between honest science and totalitarian scientism. There is no way to determine ultimate origin --- whether the Big Bang "began things," or if there have already been an infinite number of "Big Bangs," or, if the material universe is attributable to some tertium quid. It is, I believe, demonstrable that the human mind can no more wrap itself around the universe than we can use our teeth to bite our teeth. (We may approximate such "purchase" by extracting a tooth, but then we bump against Tolkien's dictum: "He that breaks a thing to find out what it is has left the path of wisdom.") In any event, the tool never comprehends the toolmaker. "The lesser" is subject to the unfathomable mystery of "the greater." In Smith's terms, we humans are "lesser beings" derived from "greater Being," and, furthermore, matter derives from the primacy of spirit. When confronting the Enveloping Whole, it is inevitable that we believe something about the overarching context in which we find ourselves. Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle demonstrates that human subjectivity necessarily changes the appearance (and -- given the continuity of "objectivity"/subjectivity -- I argue, the very Nature) of whatever we examine. Despite this inevitable subjective alteration, the pseudo-objectivity that has become "the pride of the West" is slowly being revealed as trumpery, in large part due to the mock-objective posing that pervades American culture. For all its dispassionate bombast, feigned objectivity is, at bottom, cheerleader for the Tyranny of False Alternatives. (Several years ago, Maria commented on NPR reporters: "It sounds like they don't care about what they're saying." "Objectivity" at least when over-valued may actually prevent us from taking proper care of ourselves by degrading the subjective side of our nature. The fact that we are necessarily "subjects" also makes me suspicious that "objectivity" misses every human point.) As Subjects - and as Subjects who inevitably change the "Objects" they contemplate - humans will (whether we like it or not) adopt acts of faith. Since we cannot know "objectively," our subjectivity requires leaps of faith. In the end, it is no more reasonable to posit the primacy of matter rather than the primacy of consciousness. I understand the scientific argument that supports the primacy of matter. I also observe that we cannot ultimately - reduce the question of "origin" any more than we can reduce the question of "destiny." These massive "bookends" to the human condition are unsearchably mysterious. (Mystery, by the way, derives from the Greek word "mysterion" meaning "that which can be understood only by living it through to conclusion.") Nor can we escape the inevitability of belief by saying "Alas! Some people have the gift of faith, but I haven't." Faith --- like the transcendental love that Christ would have us bestow on our enemies --- are decisions we make. They are not gifts as much as they are acts of will. To grapple honestly with these intangibles, we must consider the options, and then decide which option makes us more fully human. If we wish to avoid the alienation -- the radical breach between head and heart -- fostered by the (current) scientific>scientistic world-view, we must make our decisions, not by intellect alone, but by comprehensive "goodness of fit." When we evaluate our lives by overall "fitness," we find that the scientific world view particularly its unexamined ignorance of origins, ends and "real" subjectivity - does not fit humanity well. By not acknowledging the un-resolvability of origins, destiny and subjectivity, Science refuses to consider the question of context, thereby inviting the abuses of scientism. The modern world predicated on the myopia/magnification of science is all foreground and no background. To ignore the contextual issues of "origin" and "destiny" is as dishonest as failing to report unwanted data. The scientific mentality as scientistically deformed wishes to avoid any circumstance that obliges declarations of faith since faith seems to compromise "reasoned method." Nevertheless, deliberate ignorance is inadequate. A considered judgment must be made. Acts of faith are unavoidable. The traditional view of our ancestors accommodates the inscrutability of "origins and ends" by recognizing that "faithful decisions" are inevitable, and therefore correspond to the human need for "fitness," not just cognitively but soulfully. Tragically, the post-modern world has decided that there are no "meta-narratives" --- no stories beyond the self-contained box that can be explored by sensory probe. As an act of faith, this denial of meta-narrative is honest and acceptable. But we must be clear: such denial is in itself - an act of faith. Inside the box, there is, honestly, no way to know what if anything - might be outside the box. Our current approach to knowing "what is" and "what isn't" - reminds me of humankind's erstwhile belief that the world was flat. You come to the edge of "the known" and then you "fall off." Science would have us believe that "the box" is all there is. Then we "fall off." Perhaps Leonard Cohen describes this abyssal fall when he says: "The term clinical depression finds its way into too many conversation these days. One has a sense that a catastrophe has occurred in the psychic landscape." I am increasingly discomfited by the feeling that "the box" is a "box canyon" a lovely landform "going in" but lacking a way out. On the other hand, we do know this much about faith. Faith is inevitable, and faith is NOT knowledge. It is --- at least when we first engage the mysterion --- faith. The many practical successes of science and technology have skewed the way in which faith is practiced. In an attempt to mimic the evident appeal of scientific success, "the faithful" have increasingly insisted that they "know" the truth of God. In this regard, the Catholic Church has been embroiled in a massive theological conundrum ever since the First Vatican Council declared "papal infallibility." Ironically, this 19th century Council declared infallibility in reaction to the popularity of the many utilitarian "proofs" elucidated by science. Although I believe in an epistemology that is unique to faith which is to say the effective discernment of the mysterion over time -- faith's "point of departure" is necessarily a "Credo." We cannot pretend that this axiomatic belief is, in itself, knowledge. It is an act of faith. If faith is mistaken as knowledge, the scientifically-trained intellect will reject it. Anyone "formed" by science tends to see faith as an insult to integrity. The scientific mind feels that it must know. Lacking knowledge, it feels it must suspend judgment. In the end, faith is seen as a cop-out, a crutch, a flight of fancy, an indulgence of wishful thinking. Yet without flights of fancy -- without moral imagination -- there is no reason to curb self-interest. There is no reason why I shouldn't prize self-interest so highly that the destruction of anyone - and everyone - who gets in my way becomes plausible. The Golden Rule is meaningless if I can't imagine the equality of others. It is common to view Stalin, Idi Amin, Pol Pot and Hitler as anomalies, as pathologies. They were, in fact, people who had arrogated deity to themselves and therefore believed they were not bound by the inalienable rights of man that can only be vouchsafed by having roots in a Ground of Being. that validates them. Rather than treating such solipsists as pathological anomalies, it is, I think, more accurate to view them as God-less. Unwilling to subject themselves to the mysterious Whole that envelopesus all, they deified themselves. In the end, there will be two kinds of people, those who say to God, "Thy will be done," and those to whom God says, "Go ahead, have it your way."C. S. Lewis "I often hear that right and wrong are up to the individual. Of course, that is nonsense. Right and wrong are not up to us. If right and wrong were up to us, that would make Hitler right because he thought he was right. And he was not right. Right and wrong exist. They are invisible realities that we discover. We do not invent them." Barbara Ward "If what is good, what is right, what is true is only what the individual chooses to invent, then we are outside the tradition of civility. We are back in the war of all against all." Walter Lippmann, 1955 Annie Dillard focuses the problem clearly: "'The atom bomb is nothing to be afraid of,' Mao told Nehru. 'China has many people..... The deaths of ten or twenty million people is nothing to be afraid of.' A witness said Nehru showed shock. Later, speaking in Moscow, Mao displayed yet more generosity: he boasted that he was willing to lose 300 million people, half of China's population. Does Mao's reckoning shock me really? If sanctioning the death of strangers could save my daughter's life, would I do it? Probably. How many others' lives would I be willing to sacrifice? Three? Three hundred million?" George Braque summarizes: 'Truth exists. Falsehood must be invented.' The Rights of Man will wither if they are not rooted in the ground of being. It is insufficient to assert them. If human rights are inalienable, they subsist by transcendental union with meaning that's grounded outside the human condition, or, they do not exist at all. Alternatively, the modern world has "determined" that Homo Sapiens' prime directive is the perpetuation of individual genes. Once we adopt this credo, we validate the many dominance/submission modalities that pervade the natural world. Only acts of moral imagination lift us above zoological exigencies to "see" things that are not - or, more accurately put - things that are not of this world. For example, our attempts to "save" the weak and "genetically unsuited" are, by the light of mainstream Darwinism, "super-natural" interventions which is to say, interventions that are "above" nature. In the PBS series, "The Ascent of Man," Brownowski noted that nomadic cultures simply abandon anyone who can not keep pace with seasonal migration. "Adios. Have a nice death." No doubt this "culling" of "the weak and unsuited" resulted in a kind of genetic advantage. However, it has become commonplace for humans to value a "supernatural order" over natural genetic vigor. I've probably sent you the following excerpt before. I include it again because it is so important to this discussion: "The consciousness of the scientist, in his mechanized, dead and dumb universe, logically reaches the point where --- if he practices his science existentially and not merely intellectually -- the meaning of his own existence becomes an absurdity and he stands on the rim of the abyss of nihil face to face with his own nothingness. People are not aware of this dilemma. That it does not cause great concern is in itself a symptom of the sub-marine earthquake of which our most desperate world-problems are merely symptomatic... It is becoming ever clearer that the terrors of war, hunger and despoliation are neither economic, nor technological problems for which there are economic or technological solutions. They are primarily spiritual problems..." Frederick Franck (Frederick Franck was born into a non-observant Jewish family in Holland. He was subsequently baptized a Protestant. After graduating as a dentist, Franck began the first dental clinic at Albert Schweitzer's hospital in West Africa. Later, having embarked a career as writer and artist, Mr. Franck heeded Pope John XXIII's call to build a society of peace on earth (Pacem in Terris.) Franck became the official artist of the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965) and, as a tribute to Pope John, has created a temple of all faiths called Pacem in Terris on his property in Warwick, New York.) Like Houston Smith, I have come to believe that the abandonment of the core tenets of traditional religion is the psycho-spiritual equivalent of hacking off our own leg and letting the stump bleed. How might we heal ourselves? How might we end our compulsive self-defacement? Sadly, there is no "miracle cure." It is insufficient to choose a nearby congregation and consider it done. We are all so damaged by the ravages of "mere materialism" and so seduced by creature comforts and carnal consolation prizes that many churches (and churchgoers) represent "a clear and present danger" to any newcomer's vestigial impulse to believe. To begin a conscious revaluation of religion (from the Latin "re-ligare" meaning to "re-ligature" or to "re-connect"), I would focus on a splendid Medieval practice. Among the many ancient names of God, one that particularly appealed during the Middle Ages was "Mysterium Magnum" - the Great Mystery. I am encouraged that many scholars consider myth (and mythic fantasy) as inspired manifestations of the Mysterium Magnum. It is not accidental that Lewis and Tolkien were devout practitioners of their faith (Anglicanism and Catholicism respectively). Myth is not just an attractive way to tell a tale. Rather, myth is the Mysterium Magnum projecting bits of its Greater Being into the minds and lives of Lesser Beings whose happy destiny is blissful reunion with the Mysterium, assuming, of course, we take mythic counsel to heart. Human beings crave mystery. We also crave the solution of mystery. If forced to choose between mystery and the resolution of all mystery, humans will choose mystery. We want to know, but not as much as we want to be awed by the mysterion. If science performs its proper role, shining brilliant light on the "inside of the box," we will satisfy our urge to know. If science acknowledges the ultimate un-knowability of the Mysterium Magnum -- the inherent incomprehensibility of that which IS greater than humanity -- we will also nourish our bed-rock urge to be awed. Tolkien said that it was his goal to enrich Middle Earth by constantly introducing shards of knowledge and prophecy from "beyond," bits of knowledge evidently wrenched from un-knowlable "wholes" whose layered richness makes Middle Earth and Earth itself a miracle rather than a routine. Perhaps the essential difference between materialism and "break-the-box transcendentalism" is highlighted by contrasting the modern slogan "s/he who dies with the most toys wins" with Thoreau's comment: "It is the greatest of all advantages to enjoy no advantage at all. I found it invariably true, the poorer I am the richer I am My greatest skill has been to want but little." The post-modern mentality relies on filling the void with "stuff," confident that security resides in surfeit. Thoreau, the New England Transcendentalist, feels no impulse to fill the Void but rather relies on the Void to provide him what little he needs, knowing that less is more. Consider Thoreau's "do-nothing" meditative posture: "He will get to the goal first who stands stillest." Who knows? If "less is more," perhaps "nothing (no-thing) is everything." The point is: we don't know and can't know. However, there is no alternative but to stake our lives on belief. Chesterton argued that "tradition is the democracy of the dead." As human beings (but also as "democrats") we owe it to ourselves - as we owe it to our ancestors - to scrutinize the inevitable acts of faith we make, and to give serious consideration to investing our faith according to the "voting results" of "the democracy of the dead." Our "human" forebears kept the human experiment "alive and well" for 100,000 to 4,000,000 years. They did so on the merits of faith. In the last 250 years -- which correspond precisely to the emergence of the scientific world view -- the human experiment suddenly finds itself in mortal jeopardy. The crisis of irreligiosity is as serious as environmental degradation. Our refusal to recognize the inevitability of belief -- and our further refusal to recognize that most of us really worship the Golden Calf -- is to perpetuate the contamination of what Gregory Bateson calls "the ecology of mind." Whether we contemplate physical or metaphysical ecosystems, we face deadly thresholds on both fronts. On both fronts, we discern similar causality lack of reverence and loss of affection for the over-arching integrity of the Mysterium Magnum. If the "stories" are to be believed and I believe they are this planet and its biosphere emerged from the Mysterium Magnum. I must insert a cautionary note. The words "ecology" and "environment" although useful "markers" reduce "the world" to something smaller than we are. "Ecology" and "environment" conjure the belief that humans are "in charge" of a lesser, more fragile thing. Although this image shapes a significant truth, we purchase this micro-truth at the expense of macro-distortion. The "environment" is immeasurably larger than we, and will take care of itself. By a subtle and insidious pathway, environmentalism represents the world as a tidy "terrarium," neatly enclosed, manageable, a sort of universe "bounded by a nutshell." However, the universe is not bounded. When we stop thinking in terms of a "terrarium" when we abandon notions of "self-enclosure" we then perceive "the enveloping whole" as proceeding (without pause) from earth's atmosphere into outer space, and from outer space into every holy "beyond" whether "real" or "imaginary." In this view, we realize our derivativeness, our radical dependence, our mysterious location in a universe comprised of "the sensory" and "the supersensory". The rudimentary fact that we ought not foul our nest does not qualify us as "creators," "authors," "originators" or "almighty organizers," but only as humble creatures who have learned "to take out the trash." Even if the biosphere becomes unlivable, the "environment" will eventually heal itself. Only when we conceive our physical and metaphysical - matrix as the immediate manifestation of an "infinitely (and infinitely inter-active) continuum" will we focus "the environment" as both "Greater" and "Mystery." Ironically, "Greater Mystery" is a minimalist definition of God. By this definition, anyone who claims to be an "environmentalist" anyone who surrenders unordered will and subjects personal agency to the lineaments of the "Greater Mystery" -- is, ipso facto, a Deist. In this context, "surrender" does not mean "abandon." Rather, surrender refers to an essential act of humility that is the only vantage from which we see ourselves as "derivative of the Whole." Fortified by this truth and heartened by our "fit" participation in the Whole, personal agency embarks harmonic collaboration with the Mysterium Magnum rather than whimsical manipulation of its dis-integrated parts. We are not our own. We belong to the Mysterium Magnum. (See Footnote 1) "We of today can hardly imagine how seamlessly traditional peoples have woven the great world of nature into the spiritual aspects of their lives. To cite a single example, the Pawnee people of Oklahoma pattern their houses after the architecture of nature as they understand it. Still today, often sitting at night on rooftops, children hear from their parents how Evening Star and the Moon created the first girl child, and Morning Star and the Sun created the first boy child. The Great Chief star that shines from the direction of the winter wind and never moves is pointed out to them, and until sleep overcomes them, they watch the rest of the stars circle around him. The Great Chief star reminds tribal chiefs of their responsibility to care for their people. Nothing like this sense of belonging can be derived from the scientific worldview. In his 9th decade now, Czeslaw Milosz sees himself as having lived to see the dawning of "the age of homelessness."" Houston Smith I'm reminded of Iris Murdoch's observation that "Love... is the extremely difficult realization that something other than oneself is real." Or, in the case of our scientific worldview: "Love is the extremely difficult realization that the Whole is greater than the sum of the parts, and, furthermore, that the Whole is more real than science." A revealing anecdote... Just yesterday, my five year old boy Danny refused to eat his "meat and potatoes". When Denise realized that he could not be cajoled, she reluctantly served dessert. Placing a sliver of pumpkin pie on his plate, she spat out between clenched teeth: "Well At least this will give you beta carotene." Then, administering a dollop of whipped cream, she uttered "And here's some calcium." This approach to "life" while consummately scientific is intrinsically inhuman. It is precisely at this critical bifurcation of Life and scientific reductionism that we "occasional mouthpieces of the Whole" must put science in its subordinate, derivative place. Otherwise, human beings will drift further into joylessness until, at last, we find ourselves trapped by the despair that resides at the heart of materialist determinism. (More accurately, I should refer to the "heartlessness" of materialist determinism. Or, as Lao Tzu hinted 2500 years ago, "Nature is not human hearted.") George Carlin said: "We're all fucked. It helps to remember that." Carlin's admonition a remarkably accurate restatement of the Doctrine of Original Sin - is a pretty good place to start. If we manage to avoid Poe's "imp of the perverse" -- that demi-urge to exacerbate one's plight out of sheer perversity, to revel in being fuck ups - we might actually find our way home. All mythic and mystical indications suggest that the Mysterium Magnum has made the universe ultimately -- an ineffably friendly place, something like a cross between a Hobbit Hole and the Last Homely Home. But between now and then there will be much anguish accompanying the joy. It is our appointed task and within our appropriate domain - to turn over all stones, name all beasts, contemplate all horror, and then in good faith "go home." The Norse word for death is heimgang "homegoing." We shall not cease from exploration and the end of all our exploring Will be to arrive where we started and to know the place for the first time. Thomas Stearns (T.S.) Eliot PS I may have misread your motive for adding "world religions" to your reading list. If your desire is to understand (and contextualize) Islam, you'll find abundant riches at http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/islam/islamsbook.html#Islam%20Faith%20and%20Theology PPS Here's another keen observation by Hannah Arendt. (I should have included this excerpt in my recent "Homeland Security" mailing.) "When we were told that by freedom we understood free enterprise, we did very little to dispel this monstrous falsehood. Wealth and economic well-being, we have asserted, are the fruits of freedom, while we should have been the first to know that this kind of "happiness" has been an unmixed blessing only in this country, and it is a minor blessing compared with the truly political freedoms, such as freedom of speech and thought, of assembly and association, even under the best conditions." Hannah Arendt Arendt's observation is a fit sequel to the foundational premise of post-War America, expressed with diabolic self-possession by George Kennan, the leading architect of the Cold War: "We have about 50% of the world's wealth, but only 6.3% of its population... In this situation, we cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment. Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity without positive detriment to our national security. To do so, we will have to dispense with all sentimentality and day-dreaming; and out attention will have to be concentrated everywhere on our immediate national objectives. We need not deceive ourselves that we can afford today the luxury of altruism and benefaction.... The day is not far off when we are going to have to deal in straight power concepts. The less we are then hampered by idealistic slogans, the better.'" Policy Planning Study #23, released to members of the State Department in February, 1948. I should also note former Attorney General Ramsey Clark's summarization of Kennan's realpolitik: "The greatest crime since World War II has been U.S. foreign policy." PPS I encourage you to add Chesterton's "Orthodoxy" to your list. This 1908 publication is, I think, the finest book written in the 20th century. Having said that, "Orthodoxy" contains one abominable chapter "The Ethics of Elfland." I beg you NOT to read "The Ethics of Elfland" until you've finished the rest of the book, and maybe not then. I also recommend - in addition to "The Great Divorce" mentioned above C.S. Lewis' "That Hideous Strength," the final novel of his so-called "Space Trilogy." In reading "That Hideous Strength," do not be "put off" by a lengthy (and possibly tedious) section entitled "The Head." You should also read something by Ivan Illich. "Tools for Conviviality" (available on-line) suits your scientific nature well. If you've never read Lewis Mumford, I think he should also be on your list. Try "The Pentagon of Power: The Myth of the Machine." If you haven't read Gabriel Garcia Marquez' "One Hundred Years of Solitude" or "Big Mama's Funeral" (Los Funerales de la Mamá Grande), please do. Marquez captures the very soul of the peasantry, the largest and most politically impotent group of all time, also the staff of life for all those "professional people" with "more important things to do." Although a quirky recommendation, I suggest "The Bridge of San Luis Rey" by Thornton Wilder. It was Wilder who said that "literature is the orchestration of platitudes." He orchestrates them beautifully. And lastly, please read the 81 brief poems that comprise "Tao Te Ching" by Lao Tzu (Tze). I like the century old translation by Lionel Giles now difficult to find. However, on a recent trip to Durham's Regulator Bookstore, I noticed that Ursula LeGuin has published her own translation of these 3000 words. I also encourage you not to overlook the four Gospels. "Mark" was first among those that have survived (it was written around 60 A.D.), and spans a mere eighteen (18) pages. Matthew and Luke share a similar, synoptic style. John is "odd man out" displaying a much more mystical orientation. In my "Revised English Bible" (a translation I quite like) all four Gospels cover a total of 101 pages. I would argue against books of topical interest like "Too Close to Call" and "The Next Fifty Years." There just isn't time enough to read things that haven't withstood "the test of time" and aren't likely to. Remember: if you read 2 books a week from age 18 to 75, you read a grand total of 5928 books. Personally, I know no one who has consistently read a single book a week, which of course brings the total to under 3000. For "mere mortals" a book a month might be do-able although it's still a stretch. If you manage 12 books a year, you'll read 684 in your life-time. Most likely you'll read fewer than 500. Most professional people read about 300. Choose carefully. PPS I, and my best friend Steve Gibson (now deceased), used to argue about modern violence. Steve believed that modern violence was no worse than in previous times. I disagreed with Steve's assessment and continue to disagree. As one measure of increased violence, I would point to the Battle of Gettysburg which took 52,112 lives. Not only did this battle kill a huge number of people in three days, but and this is the exception that proves the rule it only killed one civilian. (Notably, the relentless artillery at Gettysburg could be heard in Pittsburgh, 140 miles away.) Although organized religion has served as brothel, brokerage and charnel house, I agree with Paul Johnson: "The history of the 20th century proves the view that as the vision of God fades, we first become clever monkeys; then we exterminate one another." I also think that as a nation - we have learned to terrorize ourselves, and that the current "war on terror" is, very likely, a subtle projection (and counter-projection) of this self-imposition. What do I mean by self-imposed terror? In the last 30 years for reasons relating to 1.) the irreligious denial of death, 2.) our national obsession with speed, and 3.) the demographic fact that American families now have but one or two kids (and therefore feel compelled to dote on this "highly concentrated investment"), we have grown extraordinarily anxious over issues of health and safety. Kids can't "just go out and play" any more. When I was a kid, the screen door slammed behind me no sooner than I'd shouted "I'm goin' out to play Mom!" God knows where I'd play all day - anywhere feet or bike would take me. Visit local malls. Ride rafts on remote ponds. Walk to the beach. For a while, I accompanied a friend with a small "fur business" while he checked his muskrat traps. Back at his garage we'd gut 'em and skin 'em. My parents had no idea where I was. If Mom wanted us, she'd shout from the front porch. If we didn't hear her, she'd go about her business for another two or three hours. Sun-screen? Give me a break. Fussin' about white sugar? Puhleeeeese! Today, after four decades of "advancement" we are informed of new health threats daily. (And now, with 24/7 NPR news, we ratchet up our "consciousness" of socio-political threats as well.) It's as if we've created a Minimum Daily Requirement for Fear. (Justified fear, of course. Highly academicized fear. Reasonable fear. Good fear. And LOTS of it! Gobs and gobs.) Given this relentless bombardment of fear, everyone's fright-or-flight mechanism is stuck on Red Alert. For example, I just sent Kim a URL on C-reactive protein (CRP), the newest way for those of us with "good cholesterol readings" to fret over sudden heart attack. Why do we have so much difficulty learning that "the real death rate is one per person?" As enlightened as we pretend to be -- and it is all pretense! -- we delude ourselves that incidence and risk statistics can somehow be made to exempt us. "It's the other guy! Honest! I'm getting healthier every minute. Pretty soon, I'll live forever." I believe that all modern technology does not compensate the recently-dismantled "religious technologies" whereby people coped with adversity, maintained dignity within poverty (usually by not knowing they were poor), accepted death, grieved, and then proceeded with their lives, hopeful of eventual reunion. These psycho-spiritual abilities - and the various forms of faith that enable them "fit" our souls. Our self-imposed terrorization, slowly morphing into the subtle projection of our own terror onto "the bad guys over there" -- and most recently onto the errant "cells" right here in The Homeland -- create no harmonies, produce no profoundly human fitness. The world has "shrunk" and we can no longer heave our projectiles into "the absolute elsewhere." Today, "everywhere" is the same place. The terror comes full circle home. No longer can we "quarantine" perceived problems. There are no remaining "isolation rooms." Our faith in Homeland Security, our faith in the elimination of al Qaeda, our faith in the extraordinary benefits of Iraqi "regime change," our faith in the righteousness of Israel, our faith (only recently tarnished) in the beneficence of corporate America, our faith in pharmaceutical salvation, our faith in Public Instruction, our faith in the military-industrial complex are all proof of Chesterton's dedicatory note: 'When a man stops believing in God he doesn't then believe in nothing, he believes anything.' What if - as Lewis says: "There seems no plan because it's all plan. There seems no center because it's all center." What if - as Chesterton says: 'We've been living off the bankroll of Christendom, making continual withdrawals and no deposits.' "Every one of us is like a man who sees things in a dream and thinks that he knows them perfectly and then wakes up to find that he knows nothing." Plato Footnote 1 In defense of Roe v. Wade, Anna Quindlen --Newsweek, 1/27/03 -- says: "American women know more about their bodies today. They understand the fine points of reproduction; they know what the fetus is and, as important, what it isn't. They have developed a sense of themselves as educated consumers, whether in childbirth, in menopause or in maintenance; they have a sense of ownership of the equipment." We will not get far as human beings or as a culture if we define ourselves as "consumers." It is wrongly assumed that being "educated consumers" is a salvific qualifier. If we were truly educated, we wouldn't identify ourselves as "consumer units." I'm also initrigued by Ms. Quindlen's assertion that that Amercan women know what the fetus is and isn't. Setting aside the debatable issue of whether the fetus is a "human person" I assume that American woman know that the fetus is a "human being." It is. And it's human. Now what? Most ominous of all is Quindlen's proud assertion that modern women "have a sense of ownership of the equipment." Adherents of traditional world views conceive human beings as derivative of Greater Being. They do not see other human beings as essentially mechanical, nor do they see themselves as alienated, self-divided owners of their bodies but rather as stewards. In Christian mysticism -- particularly its Russian variant -- we find repeated reference to being "God-possessed." We do not own ourselves. The environment, which -- at its most rarefied level -- morphs into the Mysterium Magnum, owns us. What Teilhard de Chardin S.J. called "the divine milieu" refers to the mysterious context in which we are embedded as subsidiary "parts", not proud, pre-emptive proprietors. David Carlin, former Rhode Island congressman, wrote a persuasive essay concerning choice and taboo. He asked his readers to consider two competing scenarios: 1.) A committed - but ravenous - American "weight watcher" suddenly finds himself in a room containing a boundless array of delectable pastries. 2.) A ravenous devotee of Islam suddenly finds himself in a room containing a boundless array of delectable pork dishes. Now -- with the life of your children hanging in the balance -- would you bet that the weight-watcher, or the Islamic, will refrain from eating. I don't deny the value of examing taboos. Indeed, such scrutiny is indispensable. However, when we no longer honor taboo, we engage selfishness, relinquish restraint and plunder the planet. Einstein's advocacy for global peace also holds true for environmental integrity: "Unless the cause of peace-based-on-law gathers behind it the force and zeal of a religion, it hardly can hope to succeed......There must be added that deep power of emotion which is a basic ingredient of religion." Footnote 2 It is a source of bafflement that the Left undervalues the power of advertisement. Madison Avenue spends tens of billions of dollars per year to play on the visceral impulses that inform blind consumership. Blithely, the Left pretends that this bilge occupies some sort of mysterious quarantine. The best paper in central North Carolina, "The Independent Weekly" http://www.indyweek.com/durham/current/ has half a dozen pages in the back of every edition advertising "Free Pick Ups," sex talk 900 numbers and other romantic banalities. There is more admirable moral indoctrination in a typical church bulletin than the aggregate of left-wing emails I receive in a week. Our public schools are the front-line indoctrination centers for America the Good and America the All-powerful. Take, for example, the pledge of allegiance and increasingly commercialized fast-food cafeterias. It surpasses weird that leftists instinctively advocate for the expansion of school budgets. (N.B. Washington D.C. public schools spend over $10,000.00 per student per year. Do your elected representatives send their children to these schools? Would you send your children to these schools?) |